If I thought I knew enough to do it properly I'd do it happily. I like
the combination very much, and I certainly agree it would be nice if it
were easier to put together. Of course, Robin D does put together .dmg
binaries from time to time; there just isn't one yet for wxPython
2.5.4. I don't know how to do it in a way that allows for the
variations (unicode or not, replacing an old installation or not . . .
trust me, everybody will be happier if I don't undertake this.
Charles Hartman
On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:20 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:12 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
Probably everybody else knows this already, but I'll mention that
under OS 10.3.8 I'm now happily running Python 2.4.1 with wxPython
2.5.4.1. (I had a hard time getting wxPython built -- wouldn't have
gotten it at all without lots of help from Robin Dunn -- but anyone
who knew what he or she was doing wouldn't have any trouble.) The two
*seem* to be playing perfectly happily together.
I'd love to see a binary distribution for this. Building
wxWidgets/wxPython is painful and slow. I build a lot of stuff, but
wxPython is something I'd rather have someone else deal with..
Hopefully the Python 2.4.1 distribution I put out is enough of a
catalyst to get their wheels turning :)
-bob
_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
