On Jun 2, 2005, at 10:02 PM, Nick Matsakis wrote:

>
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Nick Matsakis wrote:
>
>
>> Finally, on the matter of Python 2.4, is there a standard place  
>> that the
>> macpython 2.4.1 looks for packages?  /Library/Python/2.4/site- 
>> packages,
>> perhaps?
>>
>
> So, my understanding is that independent framework builds of macpython
> default to only looking in their site-packages folder (in fact,  
> this is
> how Apple's installs works, except that their site-packages folders  
> are
> softlinks to folders within /Library/Python).
>
> In building the appscript installer, I see two options: either  
> create a
> package that is able to find the python frameworks by using Apple's  
> system
> for upgrading relocateable bundles, then as the user where to  
> install the
> software OR install the 2.4 software in /Library/Python/2.4/site- 
> packages
> and provide a couple of .pth files on the disk image that people  
> can drag
> into their installation's site package.  I'm strongly leaning  
> towards the
> second option, because its a lot less work for me and I think it  
> offers
> more flexibility to the end user as well.

MacPython 2.4.1 looks in the site-packages directory embedded in its  
framework.  There is only one supported framework location (/Library/ 
Frameworks), so there's no need to care about alternatives.  If you  
build the installer with py2app's bdist_mpkg, you don't have to care  
about these details, because it does the right thing.

-bob

_______________________________________________
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig

Reply via email to