On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: > Bob Ippolito wrote: > >> That whole section really needs to be restructured to address the >> common questions and issues people have regarding finding the right >> packages for them. > > great idea. > >> I think I'd like to turn http://pythonmac.org/ >> packages/ into just a launch pad for finding a list of packages for >> the Python that you're interested in. > > Do you mean that it wouldn't actually host them for download there?
No, I mean that that URL won't directly list any packages. It'll be a listing of package lists and enough information to direct a newish user to the right list. > Please no. I think it is a VERY good idea to have a collection > there for > download. Pretty soon, I think we'll be able to call the 2.4.3 > Universal > build the "officially recommended" build, and we can have a collection > of packages there for it. I now I'll contribute a few, and I'm sure > others will as well. > > One question is: should they be eggs or traditional *.mpkgs? I'd certainly prefer eggs where possible, but transitionally we're definitely going to need *.mpkgs. Maybe both for now, and/or separate pages for .mpkgs and binary eggs? -bob _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
