On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:00 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: > Bob Ippolito wrote: > >> No, I mean that that URL won't directly list any packages. It'll >> be a >> listing of package lists and enough information to direct a newish >> user >> to the right list. > > Then yes, that's a great idea. I am, as we e-speak, reworking those > pages with a different structure now. I'm no web designer, but it > should > give us something that someone can make prettieer if they want. > >> I'd certainly prefer eggs where possible, but transitionally we're >> definitely going to need *.mpkgs. Maybe both for now, and/or >> separate >> pages for .mpkgs and binary eggs? > > What happens if you double-click on a *.egg?
Nothing yet, but it wouldn't be that hard to make a little app that associates itself with .egg > I like that anyone with OS-X can figure out how to install from a > *.mpkg Sure. Ideally bdist_mpkg will produce *.mpkg installers that just contain eggs (for bootstrapping maybe), but that's not currently the case. -bob _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
