Daniel Lord wrote: > Kent, > > Thanks for the link. I am just lazy (that's why I like Python over > C/CPP/ObjC when I can get away with it) and would prefer the lightweight > (to design and code that is not as in process overhead) threads over > separate application processes. But certainly you get more flexibility > and power for the increased effort.
It looks from the examples like it may not be much effort. Certainly designing a correct program with threading has some challenges also. The 'processing' package explicitly attempts to mimic the API of threading: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/processing The examples for pp look pretty straightforward as well: http://www.parallelpython.com/content/view/17/31/ Kent _______________________________________________ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
