thomas.pav...@free.fr wrote: > [Jochem Berends wrote:] >> As said, I am very excited for this project and I am eager to help out >> where neccessary! > > I'm happy that a KBE expert join this list. My field is rather product > data management and interoperability. I especially focuses on PDM/ERP > interoperability (as a PhD candidate too) and the STEP standard as a way > to overcome the related issues. Our approaches are quite complentary. > No doubt this mix will lead to rich exchanges and realizations.
I also welcome a KBE expert to the list! I am also very interested in this area. I have an application I am working on to create Python class definitions from OWL ontologies. I also have code to create the Python objects as Storm objects (<https://storm.canonical.com/>), and I have some sql-generation code for the back end (a separable issue, of course, but I include it in my app). All of this is in a partially broken state at the moment, because I am doing some refactoring and adding more unit tests, but I will be happy to share any of this as soon as it is working well enough to demonstrate the concept. My goal (which probably fits well with KBE) is to have engineering application objects defined by ontologies, so that they can be reasoned about using first-order logic engines, rules, etc. Cheers, Steve _______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
