Hi Thomas, Thanks for your blameless support. On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Thomas Paviot <tpav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it's actually better to compile pythonOCC trunk. It's compliant > with the latest rev. of salomegeometry trunk. > > In that case should I use salometrunk instead of the rev.175? > Maybe you have to add '-march=X86-64 -m64' as an extra compile arg. You can > have a look to the environment.py script and copy/paste the way I solved the > 64 bits issue on MacOSX. > Actually I've already changed, I changed environment.py : ECA = ['-O0','-march=%s'%platform.machine()] to ECA = ['-O0','-march=x86-64 -m64'] But you could make it conditional in order not to screw 32 bits build. > Strange. What version of swig do you use? Everything goes fine with 1.3.39 > but I noticed an error with 1.3.40. I use 1.3.39. > Actually, I use the repositories one which 1.3.36. I can give a quick try to 1.3.39, even though you might not see it as a good long term solution. > Ok, I will commit in a few minutes what I think is necessary and you'll be > able to try it. > I'll try as soon as I see your commit. Bye. Loïc
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
