2009/9/18 Simon Loic <simon1l...@gmail.com>

> Hi Thomas,
> Thanks for your blameless support.
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Thomas Paviot <tpav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think it's actually better to compile pythonOCC trunk. It's compliant
>> with the latest rev. of salomegeometry trunk.
>>
>>
> In that case should I use salometrunk instead of the rev.175?
>

Yes.


>
>
>> Maybe you have to add '-march=X86-64 -m64' as an extra compile arg. You
>> can have a look to the environment.py script and copy/paste the way I solved
>> the 64 bits issue on MacOSX.
>>
>
> Actually I've already changed,  I changed environment.py :
> ECA = ['-O0','-march=%s'%platform.machine()] to ECA = ['-O0','-march=x86-64
> -m64']
> But you could make it conditional in order not to screw 32 bits build.
>

Absolutely.


>
>
>> Strange. What version of swig do you use? Everything goes fine with 1.3.39
>> but I noticed an error with 1.3.40. I use 1.3.39.
>>
>
> Actually, I use the repositories one which 1.3.36.
> I can give a quick try to 1.3.39, even though you might not see it as a
> good long term solution.
>
>
>> Ok, I will commit in a few minutes what I think is necessary and you'll be
>> able to try it.
>>
>
> I'll try as soon as I see your commit.
> Bye.
>

Ok.


> Loïc
>
>
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Pythonocc-users mailing list
Pythonocc-users@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users

Reply via email to