I ran a few other tests. The 'curvature sensitivity' of MEFISTO mesher appears more clearly when the size of the elements is smaller (i.e. more triangles relies on the surface). But it also seems that the mesher is 'boundary adaptative': you can notice that the mesh is more precise near the boundary. This could be shown with the meshing of a planar surface.
Thomas 2009/12/7 Jelle Feringa <jelleferi...@gmail.com> > Very impressive work Thomas! > It looks like the meshing with mefisto is curvature adaptive, but > looking at the example i see nothing related to that... > Mysterious... still, so exiting to have Fields medalists code in our > repository ;') > > -jelle > > > On Dec 4, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Thomas Paviot wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > After a few hours of work, with a help from Fotis, the MEFISTO 2D > > triangle mesher is available for all platforms (Mac, Linux, Windows) > > and integrated to pythonOCC. > > > > Attached 2 screenshots extracted from the surfacic_mesh.py sample > > script: the first one obtained from the smesh builtin 2D mesher, the > > second one using MEFISTO2D. > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > <Capture d’écran 2009-12-04 à 19.21.18.png><Capture d’écran > > 2009-12-04 à > > 19.21.29.png>_______________________________________________ > > Pythonocc-users mailing list > > Pythonocc-users@gna.org > > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Pythonocc-users mailing list > Pythonocc-users@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users >
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
