2009/12/7 Jelle Feringa <jelleferi...@gmail.com> > > I ran a few other tests. The 'curvature sensitivity' of MEFISTO > > mesher appears more clearly when the size of the elements is smaller > > (i.e. more triangles relies on the surface). But it also seems that > > the mesher is 'boundary adaptative': you can notice that the mesh is > > more precise near the boundary. This could be shown with the meshing > > of a planar surface. > > Interesting, I kind of expected a more explicit reference to curvature. > The mefisto mesher seems pretty impressive to me! > > -jelle >
We have to investigate it further. The best solution would be to create a set of test cases and perform meshing operations over them (I mean, with the available meshers available from smesh). The output: an html page for this benchmark, with results displayed in a table (time, number of elements, memory consumption etc.). Thomas
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
