Hi Henrik, we opened a new thread about this sample wiki page thing. However I think your questions are mode general, as your proposal would imply a deeper modification in pythonOcc web site. However, your point is valid, so maybe you can make your ow thread.
Loïc PS: About your link I really like the following examples http://openprocessing.org/visuals/?visualID=6320 By crossing your eyes you can see the object (a cube here) in real 3D (without stereo glasses). It's quite difficult to get the two images overlap at first, but then it's pretty impressive how the brain keep in this configuration with no effort! Ok I'm going off topic here. On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Henrik Rudstrom <hrudst...@googlemail.com>wrote: > Like the initiative! think there are way to few google-hits for pythonocc, > or occ for that matter! > > What's also interseting to consider is how the samples are presented > online. are they just going to be static pages, or maybe more interactive > with some commenting/discussion features? One step further could be to allow > registred users to post their own samples/showoffs/useful snippets/problems > with screenshots and code, make it a bit more alive, and it'd be nice to see > what/how people are cooking up with occ. I really like the format of this > site: openprocessing.org. > Just wondering whether the user base is big enough and whether the programs > people write are suitable for sharing (in part or as a whole)? > > Any thoughts? > > Im not sure a standard wiki-system can handle this, but i think a slightly > customized blogging or forum system could work. I'd be willing to help out > on that part if there's more interest on this subject. > > > > Henrik Rudstrom > > > > 2009/12/10 Thomas Paviot <tpav...@gmail.com> > > Perfect, let's go for it. Please create a new thread related to this topic. >> >> Thomas >> >> 2009/12/10 Simon Loic <simon1l...@gmail.com> >> >> Hi, >>> As there are enough people interested in this sample documentation web >>> page, maybe it's time to start a new thread with a better adapted title, and >>> discuss different possibilities. Then once we converge on the approach (to >>> generate html doc pages and screenshots), we can decide who's doing what. >>> What dou you think? >>> Regards, >>> Loïc >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Jelle Feringa >>> <jelleferi...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Its so cool to have you on this list Fotios ;') >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pythonocc-users mailing list >>>> Pythonocc-users@gna.org >>>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pythonocc-users mailing list >>> Pythonocc-users@gna.org >>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pythonocc-users mailing list >> Pythonocc-users@gna.org >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pythonocc-users mailing list > Pythonocc-users@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users > >
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
