Dear Thomas, I have to say that I have not at the moment an AP209 file format under hand, BUT there are some NAFEM benchmarks (AP209 benchmarks homepage<http://www.caesarsystems.co.uk/NAFEMS_benchmarks/AP209_benchmark.html> ).
To avoid you any further researchs, you can consider these links: - this file contains both input deck and ?target? results<http://www.caesarsystems.co.uk/NAFEMS_benchmarks/data/le2p209femesh.stp>(test page <http://www.caesarsystems.co.uk/NAFEMS_benchmarks/le2.html>) - this file is another example<http://www.caesarsystems.co.uk/NAFEMS_benchmarks/tr1/BM-2-B.stp>(test page <http://www.caesarsystems.co.uk/NAFEMS_benchmarks/tr1.html>) and other benchmarks can be found here<http://www.caesarsystems.co.uk/NAFEMS_benchmarks/standardbm.html> . Best regards, Pierre PS: I understand that AP209 2edition is gonna be released "soon". 1st edition (supported by OCC) dates back to 2001. 2010/5/25 Thomas Paviot <tpav...@gmail.com> > 2010/5/25 Pierre JUILLARD <pierre.juill...@gmail.com> > > Dear pythonOCC team, >> >> I would like to know if PythonOCC wrap some OCC functionalities regarding >> STEP AP209? >> As I pointed out in a previous mail, it is indicated >> here<http://www.opencascade.org/about/news/issue103/>and >> here <http://www.opencascade.org/about/news/issue108/> that OCC has some >> compatibility with this neutral format. >> >> I thank you in advance for your indications. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Pierre >> >> > Hi Pierre, > > I didn't test the AP209 features, but OCC supports the AP209. Don't know > however what it returns. > > Could you provide a sample AP209 file so that we could test these features? > > Thomas > > _______________________________________________ > Pythonocc-users mailing list > Pythonocc-users@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users > >
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users