Hi Jelle, It is a little off-topic, but no. I actually use both. It depends a little on the use-case we have. In cases where the tasks is more oriented to mesh-based data I use the XDMF format. This is XML for the descriptive part and HDF5 (PyTables) for the heavy data. For monitoring a physical test, the main task is orchestrating data producers (data acquisition systems) and data consumers (graphing and data processing/monitoring tools). In the latter case I am using CouchDb. However, combining both of them is also possible. Thus I can perfectly imagine storing a HDF5 database inside a CouchDb document. Again, the metadata will be present in the document attributes (typical key-value pairs) these can be queried easily. While the HDF5 part is a blob inside the same document.
Regards, Marco On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Jelle Feringa <jelleferi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I will try to write a testcase in the next few weeks and post it here. > > I'm very curious. I know you've been working with pytables too; did you > chance from using pytables ( hdf5 ) to couchdb? > > -jelle > > _______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
