2012/1/5 MilošKomarčević <kmi...@gmail.com> > Thomas Paviot <tpaviot@...> writes: > > Of course it's the best and easier solution. pythonocc actually uses a > ridiculous number of Qt features (only creating a window, a simple menu, > catching events). I've been monitoring the PySide project since it was > started, > but I did not have time to go deeper. Also, I'm working on an OSX machine, > which > is quite a nightmare to develop pythonocc gui features since the OCC > backend > relies on X11. Happy Linux users! > > > > Just throwing out another one, which could kill two birds: switching to > wxPython? >
FYI, a wxPython backend is already available in pythonocc. You can choose either PyQt, wxPython or X python wrapper. Thomas
_______________________________________________ Pythonocc-users mailing list Pythonocc-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pythonocc-users
