2011/3/12 Xiaofan Chen <xiaof...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:59 PM, wander.lairson > <wander.lair...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Is it a python problem or a libusb backend problem ?? >>> Would I have better luck with openusb ?? >>> >> OpenUSB is not implemented yet. It is predicted for alpha 3 or 4 releases. >> > > I tend to think OpenUSB is more or less dead. They use libusb mailing > list as well but I have not seen anyone posting any updates about > OpenUSB for about a year (last post was sent by me about the > building problem for newer version of Linux). The last svn commit > is about 15 months ago. > http://openusb.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openusb/trunk/ > > Even if it is not totally dead as yet, it does not seem to be popular at all > as compared to libusb-0.1 and libusb-1.0. > I have been wondering about that too, but since some Linux distributions still package it, I think might be a good idea providing at least a raw support for it in PyUSB. If have trouble with it, I delay its support for a (possible) 1.1 version and proceed to stabilize the code for libusb.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ pyusb-users mailing list pyusb-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyusb-users
