On 23.07.07, Michael SCHINDLER wrote:
> > > Instead of adding more features to this type of patterns, I would
> > > rather suggest to remove the feature or replace it by a more stable
> > > one (hatching "by hand": stroking many lines and then clip). In
> > > combination with parallel deformers, this can be used to create an
> > > effect such as patterning a line.
>
> > So basically we would take the bounding box of the object to determine
> > the size of the underlying "lattice" and then do it ourselves. But
> > what kind of object in the PyX class hierarchy would this then be?
>
> Right. As it takes a path and returns a canvas, it can only be a
> pyx.deco.deco. The idea is really to replace the object by the canvas
> (ornaments), thus the decoratedpath itself should be skipped (via the
> nostrokerange mechanism).
Sounds good, so if we keep the PS/PDF native patterns, I would like this
solution.
Jörg
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
PyX-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyx-user
