Hi André,
On 21.04.08, André Wobst wrote:
> I very much like the possibility using g.doplot(plotitem) introduced
> (by user request! in PyX 0.10). We clearly should have that for the
> graph keys as well. As this is trivial to implement, I just did so.
> See changeset 2983.
+1
> The only problem I do have is with the naming. We do have g.dodata()
> and g.doplot(plotitem) and now g.dokey() and g.dokeyitem(plotitem),
> which are similar in what they supposed to do. However, they are named
> very differently. Obviously we could rename g.dodata() to g.doplot()
> and g.doplot(plotitem) to g.doplotitem(plotitem). I guess most of you
> will complain -- still, I think this change becomes necessary. Any
> thought?
Makes sense, I would add a deprecation warning, though, at least for
the dodata call. It has been documented in the examples for quite some
time and it's also obscure enough to confuse people if it does not exist
anymore.
Jörg
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
PyX-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyx-user
