Hello André, On 21.04.08, Joerg Lehmann wrote: > On 21.04.08, André Wobst wrote: > > I very much like the possibility using g.doplot(plotitem) introduced > > (by user request! in PyX 0.10). We clearly should have that for the > > graph keys as well. As this is trivial to implement, I just did so. > > See changeset 2983. > > +1
+1 also from me for this type of solution. > > The only problem I do have is with the naming. We do have g.dodata() > > and g.doplot(plotitem) and now g.dokey() and g.dokeyitem(plotitem), > > which are similar in what they supposed to do. However, they are named > > very differently. Obviously we could rename g.dodata() to g.doplot() > > and g.doplot(plotitem) to g.doplotitem(plotitem). I guess most of you > > will complain -- still, I think this change becomes necessary. Any > > thought? It is good to be consequent here. However, being really consequent, the whole graph/plot naming comes into question. A "graph" in mathematical terminology is the graphical representation of a function or the solution of an equation. In my personal naming scheme what is a "graph" in PyX would rather be a figure or a plot. Then, one would create a graph in a plot and not plot in a graph, as it is at the moment. ;-) Just a nightly thought. Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ PyX-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyx-user
