On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 11:13 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:21:16 -0700
> Tim Flink <tfl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > This came up in the qadevel meeting today and I wanted to put a bit
> > more detail out.
> > 
> > Bitbucket was never intended to be the long-term home for our git
> > projects - I think we're about the only folks in Fedora using it and
> > it's not free software. As fedorahosted is closed down, we need to
> > find a new home for blockerbugs but I figure that now is as good of a
> > time as any to get all of our git projects in the same place.
> > 
> > I'm proposing the following moves:
> > 
> > * Move all Taskotron projects to pagure.io using the taskotron group:
> >    - pagure.io/taskotron/libtaskotron
> >    - pagure.io/taskotron/resultsdb
> >    - etc.
> > 
> > * Move blockerbugs under the existing fedora-qa namespace in pagure:
> >    - pagure.io/fedora-qa/blockerbugs
> > 
> > I'm not sure if there are any plans for the openqa stuff that
> > currently lives on bitbucket but it'd be nice to see that moved as
> > well.
> > 
> > Any objections, comments, concerns?
> 
> To be a bit more explicit, I'm planning to do these migrations tomorrow
> unless there are objections.

Sounds good to me. BTW, one small gotcha in case you don't know about
it - the pagure namespaces and groups aren't actually associated /
related. Putting a project under the fedora-qa namespace doesn't give
fedora-qa members commit access to it; you have to do that separately
(in the project settings).

I'll try and move the openqa repos this week, I guess.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to