The subject hints at a question that's been nagging me for a while, and now that I'm going to be hacking on testing in Lyon I wanted to ask:
Do we have a list of articles we usually run tests against? If not, do we have any processes for curating such a list? Would anyone be interested in a brainstorming session at Lyon to discuss this further? Basically, as a developer, I would love to have more confidence that some code I wrote doesn't break on our most popular articles. Or, if we can get more sophisticated, that *certain properties of my code hold true for certain kinds of generated pages*.* Please respond with your thoughts and whether you think I should create a phab task for the hackathon about this. In either case, ping me anytime or grab me at Lyon to discuss further! Regards, Brian * Yes, I'm talking about using property-based testing generators to create random, shrinkable MW pages that we can run tests on. Not sure if it's practical, but could be an interesting experiment. -- EN Wikipedia user page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Brian.gerstle IRC: bgerstle
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
