+search On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Brian Gerstle <[email protected]> wrote:
> The subject hints at a question that's been nagging me for a while, and > now that I'm going to be hacking on testing in Lyon I wanted to ask: > > Do we have a list of articles we usually run tests against? > > If not, do we have any processes for curating such a list? Would anyone > be interested in a brainstorming session at Lyon to discuss this further? > > Basically, as a developer, I would love to have more confidence that some > code I wrote doesn't break on our most popular articles. Or, if we can get > more sophisticated, that *certain properties of my code hold true for > certain kinds of generated pages*.* > > Please respond with your thoughts and whether you think I should create a > phab task for the hackathon about this. In either case, ping me anytime or > grab me at Lyon to discuss further! > > Regards, > > Brian > > * Yes, I'm talking about using property-based testing generators to create > random, shrinkable MW pages that we can run tests on. Not sure if it's > practical, but could be an interesting experiment. > > -- > EN Wikipedia user page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Brian.gerstle > IRC: bgerstle > -- EN Wikipedia user page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Brian.gerstle IRC: bgerstle
_______________________________________________ QA mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
