On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:22 PM, esasystem <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Rob, in addition to doing the test on windows 7 64bit I can do the > test even on debian 64bit, so if there is work for me I'm ready
I reviewed the bugs from your previous batch. Good job! Some quick observations: 1) Be sure to set the "needmoreinfo" field if you are waiting for information from the user, like a sample file or more details. I see you did this in most cases, but not in this one: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121410 2) Are you setting the "difficulty" field? I see it set in many of the ones you were looking at. We should actually leave that one blank. It is for the developers to use, to classify how hard the bug is to fix. QA doesn't touch that field. 3) Did you look at this one: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121440 In any case, I see that you understand the process, so rather than me assigning you work, I'd like you to self-assign some bugs to confirm. This will allow you to focus on areas of interest and be more efficient. For example, you can have a session where you only work on spreadsheet bugs, rather than switching around applications on every bug. Here's what to do: 1) Start with this query in Bugzilla: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=unconfirmed-defects&list_id=42178 That has all unconfirmed bugs. You can either pick from that list or edit the query to narrow it down. To edit go to the bottom and click the "edit search" button. You might want to specify operating systems, products, etc. 2) Look for bugs that have an assignment of [email protected], or *.openoffice.org or *.oracle.com. Those are ones that no one is looking at. 3) Assign some interesting ones to yourself 4) Have fun 5) Post if you have any questions Thanks! -Rob
