On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:07 PM, AOO Volunteer <[email protected]> wrote: > This bug is an example where the description given by the originator is not > reproducible, but while confirming it one discovers another bug. > I assumed it is better to confirm it and describe the new bug than resolving > it and opening a separate new bug. > > Thank you very much for your reassurance. > > PS I'd rather not add my information on wiki, after all I expect nothing in > return for volunteering... >
The information in the wiki is useful so we know who can test on what platform, who has a printer, MS Office, knows scripting, etc. It helps when we receive a bug report that requires specific 3rd party apps or skills to reproduce. But it is OK if you do not want to be listed. > PPS I subscribed to the documentation list but get no emails from it? > Nothing at all? Try subscribing again by sending a note to [email protected]. It will give you an error if you are already subscribed. Regards, -Rob > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013, at 1:29, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:17 PM, AOO Volunteer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Finally, in this one issue I was confused. You marked it as >> confirmed, but your comment makes it sound like you did not see what >> the user reported. Your comment sounds like the data imported >> corrected: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=87885 >> >> Oh, one other thing: Could you add your information to this wiki page? >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/QA+Testing+Preferences >> >> Thanks for your hard work! >> >> -Rob >>
