Hi, Tino! At the moment I find myself using QBS extensively for my pet projects. But I feel confidence in its quality level and find it closer to ready for production.
Regarding projects I have been involved in for the last several years the only missing features that serve as a show stoppers are the lack of support for generation of CMake exported targets (see QBS-1233) and for building Deb packages (see QBS-417). Once these two features are implemented I am really happy to strongly consider moving production projects to be powered by QBS. On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 at 06:58, Tino Pyssysalo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > > > I’m Tino Pyssysalo, the new product owner of QBS at the Qt Company. > > > > I’d like to conduct a small survey about QBS usage in the community to > make investment and feature decisions to the product. > > > > I’d like to know, if you have used or are using QBS as a build system in > real projects and all feedback and suggestions would be mostly welcome. > This is a great opportunity to affect the future of QBS. Obviously, we are > closely following QBS issues in Jira and in this mailing list, so there’s > no need to report any known issues, unless you want to emphasize something > extremely important to you. > > > > Thanks in advance for everyone for helping me. > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > Tino Pyssysalo > > Senior Manager > > Product Management > > > > The Qt Company > > Hämeenkatu 14 C 25 > > 33100 Tampere, Finland > > [email protected] > > +358 40 8615475 > > http://qt.io > > > > The future is Written with Qt > > --- > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qbs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qbs >
_______________________________________________ Qbs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qbs
