>> But I've had a hard time to sell Qbs at work for embedded C programming. >> The major issues is that Qbs doesn't support awkward toolchains like IAR >> or TI CGT. > > There is nothing magical about that. If you provide the necessary > information, these can simply be supported by a new cpp backend.
Absolutely and by no means I wanted to blame you! I assume that "simply adding a new cpp backend" would require a responsible maintainer and continuous regression tests on that particular backend. The mentioned toolchains are usually not used by hobby-ists and thus so I do not expect anybody to invest their spare-time. At least, I won't. Can anybody share a success story how he/she introduced Qbs in their team/company? Is there anybody contributing to Qbs at work who is not directly related to The QtCompany? Richard _______________________________________________ Qbs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qbs
