On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:59:42AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 09.06.2015 um 10:41 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > BDRV_O_PROTOCOL is an internal qemu flag which a user should be able to
> > > override by explicitly specifying a block driver. This series implements
> > > this and adds two iotests (one for NBD, one for file) to test it.
> > >
> > >
> > > v2 (rebase on current master):
> > > - Patch 1: Conflict in iotest 051's reference output (in a line that is
> > >   removed by this patch anyway)
> > >
> > >
> > > git-backport-diff against v1:
> > >
> > > Key:
> > > [----] : patches are identical
> > > [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream 
> > > patch
> > > [down] : patch is downstream-only
> > > The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, 
> > > respectively
> > >
> > > 001/2:[0002] [FC] 'block: driver should override flags in bdrv_open()'
> > > 002/2:[----] [-C] 'iotests: Add tests for overriding BDRV_O_PROTOCOL'
> > >
> > >
> > > Max Reitz (2):
> > >   block: driver should override flags in bdrv_open()
> > >   iotests: Add tests for overriding BDRV_O_PROTOCOL
> > >
> > >  block.c                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > >  tests/qemu-iotests/051     |  1 -
> > >  tests/qemu-iotests/051.out |  3 ---
> > >  tests/qemu-iotests/119     | 60 
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  tests/qemu-iotests/119.out | 11 ++++++++
> > >  tests/qemu-iotests/120     | 65 
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  tests/qemu-iotests/120.out | 15 +++++++++++
> > >  tests/qemu-iotests/group   |  2 ++
> > >  8 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/119
> > >  create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/119.out
> > >  create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/120
> > >  create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/120.out
> > 
> > Please resend and CC Kevin (for qemu-iotests and block.c).
> 
> It's only you who dropped me from CC. :-)

For sanity, can you check whether you are on the CC list in Max's second
ping message: 556f5a4d.50...@redhat.com?

I had another CC mix-up recently and want to check whether my mail tools
are dropping CCs or if it's just me being confused.

Thanks,
Stefan

Attachment: pgpebXBDKeeab.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to