> >>>> Is that an Acked-by? > >>> > >>> Not a sufficient one because the patch touches files outside my area of > >>> maintenance, but for hw/scsi you can treat it as one. > >> > >> Okay, that covers PATCH 1/3. > >> > >> What about PATCH 3/3? It's actually your idea... > > > > Yep, hw/i386 too I guess. > > Do you mean the he/i386 part of PATCH 2/3? How would I express that? > Acked-by goes into the commit message, not individual files...
I mean that you only need Peter to ack now. Paolo
