Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> writes: >> >>>> Is that an Acked-by? >> >>> >> >>> Not a sufficient one because the patch touches files outside my area of >> >>> maintenance, but for hw/scsi you can treat it as one. >> >> >> >> Okay, that covers PATCH 1/3. >> >> >> >> What about PATCH 3/3? It's actually your idea... >> > >> > Yep, hw/i386 too I guess. >> >> Do you mean the he/i386 part of PATCH 2/3? How would I express that? >> Acked-by goes into the commit message, not individual files... > > I mean that you only need Peter to ack now.
I guess an easy way to ask him would be a pull request ;-P
