On 06/21/2018 12:45 AM, no-re...@patchew.org wrote:
Hi,
This series failed build test on s390x host. Please find the details below.
Type: series
Message-id: 20180621032539.134944-1-ebl...@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nbd/client: add x-block-status hack for testing
server
CC block/nfs.o
/var/tmp/patchew-tester-tmp-3490cfwt/src/nbd/server.c: In function ‘nbd_trip’:
/var/tmp/patchew-tester-tmp-3490cfwt/src/nbd/server.c:1979:19: error: ‘end’ may
be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
*length = end - offset;
~~~~^~~~~~~~
That bug (rather, a gcc false-positive solved by adding an assertion
rather than an initialization) was in the 'Based-on' prerequisite
patches rather than this one. Here's hoping that patchew will retry
when I point to the v2 pull request (oh, and how does patchew handle a
v2 pull request that intentionally only sent the patches that differed
from v1):
Based-on:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg06233.html
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
