On 3/11/19 1:51 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > From: John Snow <js...@redhat.com> > > Test that we can actually resize qcow2 images with persistent bitmaps > correctly. Throw some other goofy stuff at the test while we're at it, > like adding bitmaps of different granularities and at different times. > > Signed-off-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com> > [vsmentsov: drop \n from the end of test output, > test output changed a bit: some bitmaps goes in other order > int the output]
s/int/in/ I'm guessing the output order changed because we are no longer flushing things at intermediate steps? I have not reviewed this (or John's original patch) closely, but trust that John can determine if this is worth including for soft freeze today. But I can state that I applied all four patches of this series, to at least check that they build and the new iotests passes, so you can add: Tested-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
