On 10/11/19 2:32 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
11.10.2019 0:00, Eric Blake wrote:
Qemu as server currently won't accept export names larger than 256
bytes, nor create dirty bitmap names longer than 1023 bytes, so most
uses of qemu as client or server have no reason to get anywhere near
the NBD spec maximum of a 4k limit per string.

However, we weren't actually enforcing things, ignoring when the
remote side violates the protocol on input, and also having several
code paths where we send oversize strings on output (for example,
qemu-nbd --description could easily send more than 4k).  Tighten
things up as follows:

client:
- Perform bounds check on export name and dirty bitmap request prior
    to handing it to server
- Validate that copied server replies are not too long (ignoring
    NBD_INFO_* replies that are not copied is not too bad)
server:
- Perform bounds check on export name and description prior to
    advertising it to client
- Reject client name or metadata query that is too long

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
---

+++ b/include/block/nbd.h
@@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ enum {
    * going larger would require an audit of more code to make sure we
    * aren't overflowing some other buffer. */

This comment says, that we restrict export name to 256...

Yes, because we still stack-allocate the name in places, but 4k is too large for stack allocation. But we're inconsistent on where we use the smaller 256-limit; the server won't serve an image that large, but doesn't prevent a client from requesting a 4k name export (even though that export will not be present).


+++ b/blockdev-nbd.c
@@ -162,6 +162,11 @@ void qmp_nbd_server_add(const char *device, bool has_name, 
const char *name,
           name = device;
       }

+    if (strlen(name) > NBD_MAX_STRING_SIZE) {
+        error_setg(errp, "export name '%s' too long", name);
+        return;
+    }

Hmmm, no, so here we restrict to 4096, but, we will not allow client to request 
more than
256. Seems, to correctly update server-part, we should drop NBD_MAX_NAME_SIZE 
and do the
audit mentioned in the comment above its definition.

Yeah, I guess it's time to just get rid of NBD_MAX_NAME_SIZE, and move away from stack allocations. Should I do that as a followup to this patch, or spin a v3?

+++ b/nbd/client.c
@@ -289,8 +289,8 @@ static int nbd_receive_list(QIOChannel *ioc, char **name, 
char **description,
           return -1;
       }
       len -= sizeof(namelen);
-    if (len < namelen) {
-        error_setg(errp, "incorrect option name length");
+    if (len < namelen || namelen > NBD_MAX_STRING_SIZE) {
+        error_setg(errp, "incorrect list name length");

New wording made me go above and read the comment, what functions does. Comment 
is good, but without
it, it sounds like name of the list for me...

Maybe:

incorrect name length in server's list response


           nbd_send_opt_abort(ioc);
           return -1;
       }
@@ -303,6 +303,11 @@ static int nbd_receive_list(QIOChannel *ioc, char **name, 
char **description,
       local_name[namelen] = '\0';
       len -= namelen;
       if (len) {
+        if (len > NBD_MAX_STRING_SIZE) {
+            error_setg(errp, "incorrect list description length");

and

incorrect description length in server's list response


@@ -648,6 +657,7 @@ static int nbd_send_meta_query(QIOChannel *ioc, uint32_t 
opt,
       if (query) {
           query_len = strlen(query);
           data_len += sizeof(query_len) + query_len;
+        assert(query_len <= NBD_MAX_STRING_SIZE);
       } else {
           assert(opt == NBD_OPT_LIST_META_CONTEXT);
       }

you may assert export_len as well..

It was asserted earlier, but doing it again might not hurt, especially if I do the followup patch getting rid of NBD_MAX_NAME_SIZE


@@ -1561,6 +1569,8 @@ NBDExport *nbd_export_new(BlockDriverState *bs, uint64_t 
dev_offset,
           exp->export_bitmap = bm;
           exp->export_bitmap_context = g_strdup_printf("qemu:dirty-bitmap:%s",
                                                        bitmap);
+        /* See BME_MAX_NAME_SIZE in block/qcow2-bitmap.c */

Hmm. BME_MAX_NAME_SIZE is checked only when creating persistent bitmaps. But 
for non-persistent
name length is actually unlimited. So, we should either limit all bitmap names 
to 1023 (hope,
this will not break existing scenarios) or error out here (or earlier) instead 
of assertion.

I'm leaning towards limiting ALL bitmaps to the same length (as we've already debated the idea of being able to convert an existing bitmap from transient to persistent).


We also may want QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(NBD_MAX_STRING_SIZE < BME_MAX_NAME_SIZE + 
sizeof("qemu:dirty-bitmap:") - 1)

Except that BME_MAX_NAME_SIZE is not (currently) in a public .h file.

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Reply via email to