pet...@redhat.com writes: > From: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> > > Now multifd's logic is designed to have no spurious wakeup. I still > remember a talk to Juan and he seems to agree we should drop it now, and if > my memory was right it was there because multifd used to hit that when > still debugging. > > Let's drop it and see what can explode; as long as it's not reaching > soft-freeze. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <faro...@suse.de>
