On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 5:58 PM Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hm, I'm not sure updating to kvm/next is a good idea ("current kvm/next" > does not mean anything without a commit hash anyway.) I think we should > only update to something that's in Linus' tree already... how stable is > kvm/next?
It is stable, things are only applied there once UAPI is set. Even rebasing is very rare. The problem here is that if (as is the case for 6.11) the merge window only opens once QEMU is in freeze, waiting for it would delay merging the QEMU side by 4 months. In this case, the patches barely missed 6.10. Paolo