On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 6:25 PM Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 03 2024, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 5:58 PM Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Hm, I'm not sure updating to kvm/next is a good idea ("current kvm/next"
> >> does not mean anything without a commit hash anyway.) I think we should
> >> only update to something that's in Linus' tree already... how stable is
> >> kvm/next?
> >
> > It is stable, things are only applied there once UAPI is set. Even
> > rebasing is very rare.
> >
> > The problem here is that if (as is the case for 6.11) the merge window
> > only opens once QEMU is in freeze, waiting for it would delay merging
> > the QEMU side by 4 months. In this case, the patches barely missed
> > 6.10.
>
> If we're confident that it's stable, can we please mention a hash?Sure, it's commit 6f627b425378915b6eda30908bedefc21b70b8c4. Paolo > "current" is not very descriptive :) >
