On 26 March 2012 18:28, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
> +static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *c)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(c);
> + ARMCPUClass *class = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> +
> + class->parent_reset(c);
I thought we were avoiding 'class' in favour of 'klass'?
> +static const TypeInfo arm_cpu_type_info = {
> + .name = TYPE_ARM_CPU,
> + .parent = TYPE_CPU,
> + .instance_size = sizeof(ARMCPU),
> + .abstract = false, /* TODO Reconsider once cp15 reworked. */
As it happens I'm planning to create the per-implementation
subclasses first and do the cp15 rework second.
-- PMM
