>> +static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *c)
>> +{
>> +    ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(c);
>> +    ARMCPUClass *class = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>> +
>> +    class->parent_reset(c);
>
> I thought we were avoiding 'class' in favour of 'klass'?

I have suggested it once and I can only say it again,
please, call it 'cpu_class'. It is the least surprising name.

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max

Reply via email to