>> +static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *c) >> +{ >> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(c); >> + ARMCPUClass *class = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu); >> + >> + class->parent_reset(c); > > I thought we were avoiding 'class' in favour of 'klass'?
I have suggested it once and I can only say it again, please, call it 'cpu_class'. It is the least surprising name. -- Thanks. -- Max