Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] target/riscv: Relax fld alignment requirement

[Richard Henderson]

On 8/2/24 16:27, LIU Zhiwei wrote:

Does this really have byte atomicity, not atomic on two aligned 32-bit loads (which would be MO_ATOM_IFALIGN_PAIR).

The specification doesn't rule it. I think we can choose either way. The byte atomicity may expose more problems on alignment.

Ok.

r~