On Fri, 2024-09-06 at 15:38 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 at 15:58, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > The main aim of this patchseries is to remove the two remaining uses > > of device_class_set_parent_reset() in the tree, which are virtio-ccw > > and the s390 CPU class. Doing that lets us do some followup cleanup. > > (The diffstat looks alarming but is almost all coccinelle automated > > changes.) > > > > Changes v1->v2: > > * new patch 1 to convert hw/s390/ccw-device > > (fixes bug discovered via s390 CI testing in v1) > > * a couple of patches are already upstream > > * in the target/s390 cpu patch, fix sigp_cpu_reset() to use > > RESET_TYPE_S390_CPU_NORMAL > > * new patches 10, 11 which take advantage of the new function > > device_class_set_legacy_reset() to allow us to replace the > > generic Resettable transitional_function machinery with a > > simple wrapper that adapts from the API of the hold method > > to the one used by the legacy reset method > > > > Patches 1, 10, 11 need review. I believe that patch 1 should have > > fixed the intermittent s390 issue we found with v1 of the patchset, > > but if you could run these through the s390 CI again I'd > > appreciate it. > > I'm going to apply this series to my target-arm.next queue. > > Let me know if you need more time to CI/test/whatever it on > the s390 side before it goes upstream.
CI looks good. > > thanks > -- PMM
