Il ven 6 dic 2024, 09:42 Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> ha
scritto:

> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 at 14:28, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Yes, hence "decently" packed. But I think in both cases it's passed in
> registers, and for 64-bit machine that shouldn't change anything.
>
> True. Though it does mean we go from "space to add new fields
> without making it overflow from one register to two" to
> "completely full and no space for expanding it".
>

I guess it's enough to make unspecified the only non-bitfield. Then you can
declare MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED as { unspecified: true, ..Zeroable::ZERO }
("start with Zeroable::ZERO and change unspecified to true"). For the rest
it is not important to make them available in a "const".

Paolo

-- PMM
>
>

Reply via email to