On 3/1/25 16:15, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 04:05:58PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
As Daniel suggested [*]:
We should consider to rank HVF above TCG, on the basis
that HW acceleration is faster and should provide a
host<->guest security boundary that we don't claim for TCG
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/z07yasl2pd3cp...@redhat.com/
Note, my statement above was on the basis that HVF passes all our
functional tests, thus indicating a decent level of confidence
in the correctness of the HVF impl.
Indeed, I forgot about that, and only tested in my 'HVF-only'
directory before posting, but ...
If anyone knows any show stopper problems with HVF that would
justify blocking its promotion ahead of TCG.... say now.
... here we go:
3/15 qemu:qtest+qtest-aarch64 / qtest-aarch64/migration-test
ERROR 0.88s killed by signal 11 SIGSEGV
Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
---
system/vl.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
With regards,
Daniel
