On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:03:42 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 23/04/2012 21:38, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:36:39 +0200 > > Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> Il 23/04/2012 20:04, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: > >>> The optional parameter is fine for me too, but we recently had a > >>> discussion where it was decided that we should add new commands instead > >>> of extending existing ones. > >>> > >>> Anthony, I believe we're already taking that position, right? > >> > >> This command was never in a released version. > > > > Then why does the argument has to be optional? > > Because "don't pass the argument" is a better UI than "0" for "no speed > limit". That makes sense.
