Am 25.04.2012 20:47, schrieb Peter Portante:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Portante <peter.porta...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/spapr_hcall.c |    1 -
>  xtensa-semi.c    |    1 -
>  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/spapr_hcall.c
> index 94bb504..88c1fab 100644
> --- a/hw/spapr_hcall.c
> +++ b/hw/spapr_hcall.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
>  #include "sysemu.h"
>  #include "cpu.h"
> -#include "dyngen-exec.h"
>  #include "qemu-char.h"
>  #include "sysemu.h"
>  #include "qemu-char.h"

Careful! This part depends on http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/154522/
getting applied first - I was surprised that you didn't send it as a
two-patch series alongside the "emv" v2. (cc'ing qemu-ppc)

> diff --git a/xtensa-semi.c b/xtensa-semi.c
> index 5754b77..8c97a02 100644
> --- a/xtensa-semi.c
> +++ b/xtensa-semi.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <stddef.h>
>  #include "cpu.h"
> -#include "dyngen-exec.h"
>  #include "helpers.h"
>  #include "qemu-log.h"
>  

This part is independent of the above. If you rebase it and split it off
into its own patch (e.g., git checkout -p) then Max can apply it to his
xtensa queue already.

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg

Reply via email to