Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 at 12:57, BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu> wrote: >> >> On Sat, 1 Feb 2025, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> > - Deprecate the 'raspi4b' machine name, renaming it as >> > 'raspi4b-1g' on 32-bit hosts, 'raspi4b-2g' otherwise. >> > - Add the 'raspi4b-4g' and 'raspi4b-8g' machines, with >> > respectively 4GB and 8GB of DRAM. >> >> IMHO (meaning you can ignore it, just my opinion) if the only difference >> is the memory size -machine raspi4b -memory 4g would be better user >> experience than having a lot of different machines. > > Yes, I think I agree. We have a way for users to specify > how much memory they want, and I think it makes more sense > to use that than to have lots of different machine types.
I guess for the Pi we should validate the -memory supplied is on of the supported grid of devices rather than an arbitrary value? -- Alex Bennée Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
