On 2012-05-02 10:40, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 02.05.2012 15:24, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >>> But that would leave Illumos broken. > > For the record, reverting would leave whatever Paolo was fixing broken > but would restore Illumos. > >> I'd rather apply this one. >> >> Please do. The right solution for 1.2 is to understand the places in which >> slirp cannot use netinet/tcp.h constants (the MSS for example), and >> otherwise use that header. > > Jan, should I prepare a mechanical prefix addition as suggested by Blue? > Should we apply this ugly-but-least-intrusive build fix? Or do you have > any other preference or idea?
I'm fine with a minimal fix like you suggested. The renaming should probably be applied to a broader scope. So it's an exercise to be done systematically and without any hurry. Jan
Description: OpenPGP digital signature