On 2012-05-02 10:40, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 02.05.2012 15:24, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>>> But that would leave Illumos broken.
> For the record, reverting would leave whatever Paolo was fixing broken
> but would restore Illumos.
>> I'd rather apply this one.
>> Please do.  The right solution for 1.2 is to understand the places in which
>> slirp cannot use netinet/tcp.h constants (the MSS for example), and
>> otherwise use that header.
> Jan, should I prepare a mechanical prefix addition as suggested by Blue?
> Should we apply this ugly-but-least-intrusive build fix? Or do you have
> any other preference or idea?

I'm fine with a minimal fix like you suggested. The renaming should
probably be applied to a broader scope. So it's an exercise to be done
systematically and without any hurry.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to