On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:27:13PM +0100, Jörg Rödel wrote: > Fine with me. Just note that supporting the current non-IGVM process for > confidential guests still causes the implicit ABI issue I mentioned > before. But not being a KVM/QEMU maintainer I can live with that :)
Small addition: Note that IGVM allows for defining multiple platform targets in one image, among them non-confidential VMs. So IGVM can be used for those as well.
