On 13/5/25 16:14, Clément Chigot wrote:
From: Frederic Konrad <konrad.frede...@yahoo.fr>

This introduces a first-cpu-index property to the arm-gic, as some SOCs
could have two separate GIC (ie: the zynqmp).

Signed-off-by: Clément Chigot <chi...@adacore.com>
---
  hw/intc/arm_gic.c                | 2 +-
  hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c         | 1 +
  include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h | 2 ++
  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
index d18bef40fc..899f133363 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static const uint8_t gic_id_gicv2[] = {
  static inline int gic_get_current_cpu(GICState *s)
  {
      if (!qtest_enabled() && s->num_cpu > 1) {
-        return current_cpu->cpu_index;
+        return current_cpu->cpu_index - s->first_cpu_index;

Note, CPUState::cpu_index is meant for accelerators code and shouldn't
be used in hw/ (in particular because it vary when using hotplug).

      }
      return 0;
  }
diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
index 0f0c48d89a..ed5be05645 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
@@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ static void arm_gic_common_linux_init(ARMLinuxBootIf *obj,
static const Property arm_gic_common_properties[] = {
      DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num-cpu", GICState, num_cpu, 1),
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("first-cpu-index", GICState, first_cpu_index, 0),
      DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num-irq", GICState, num_irq, 32),
      /* Revision can be 1 or 2 for GIC architecture specification
       * versions 1 or 2, or 0 to indicate the legacy 11MPCore GIC.
diff --git a/include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h b/include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h
index 97fea4102d..93a3cc2bf8 100644
--- a/include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h
+++ b/include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h
@@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ struct GICState {
      uint32_t num_lrs;
uint32_t num_cpu;
+    /* cpu_index of the first CPU, attached to this GIC.  */
+    uint32_t first_cpu_index;
MemoryRegion iomem; /* Distributor */
      /* This is just so we can have an opaque pointer which identifies

Alternative series motivated to remove &first_cpu / qemu_get_cpu():
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20231212162935.42910-1-phi...@linaro.org/


Reply via email to