Gustavo Romero <gustavo.rom...@linaro.org> writes:

> Hi Phil,
>
> On 5/16/25 15:47, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 12/5/25 16:45, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>>> Add a functional test, aarch64_hotplug_pci, to exercise PCI hotplug and
>>> hot-unplug on arm64.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.rom...@linaro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   MAINTAINERS                                  |  5 ++
>>>   tests/functional/meson.build                 |  1 +
>>>   tests/functional/test_aarch64_hotplug_pci.py | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   3 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100755 tests/functional/test_aarch64_hotplug_pci.py
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 23174b4ca7..9ebb768214 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -2065,6 +2065,11 @@ S: Supported
>>>   F: include/hw/pci/pcie_doe.h
>>>   F: hw/pci/pcie_doe.c
>>> +ARM PCI Hotplug
>>> +M: Gustavo Romero <gustavo.rom...@linaro.org>
>> As mentioned in v2, since this might interest ARM contributors:
>>     L: qemu-...@nongnu.org
>
> I thought you're saying "include qemu-...@nongnu.org" when sending the
> patch, not "add the email into a L: section in the MAINTAINERS".
>
> The test is now queued in Alex's branch. What's best: send a patch
> now; or wait for it to land in the master branch and then send the
> patch?

I've fixed it up.

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro

Reply via email to