On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 at 01:38, Richard Henderson
<richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> This structure is part of the openrisc signal frame.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  linux-user/openrisc/target_syscall.h | 11 -----------
>  linux-user/openrisc/signal.c         | 12 ++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/openrisc/target_syscall.h 
> b/linux-user/openrisc/target_syscall.h
> index 7fe5b73d3b..c8394e9dcd 100644
> --- a/linux-user/openrisc/target_syscall.h
> +++ b/linux-user/openrisc/target_syscall.h
> @@ -1,17 +1,6 @@
>  #ifndef OPENRISC_TARGET_SYSCALL_H
>  #define OPENRISC_TARGET_SYSCALL_H
>
> -/* Note that in linux/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h,
> - * this is called user_regs_struct.  Given that this is what
> - * is used within struct sigcontext we need this definition.
> - * However, elfload.c wants this name.
> - */
> -struct target_pt_regs {
> -    abi_ulong gpr[32];
> -    abi_ulong pc;
> -    abi_ulong sr;
> -};
> -
>  #define UNAME_MACHINE "openrisc"
>  #define UNAME_MINIMUM_RELEASE "2.6.32"
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/openrisc/signal.c b/linux-user/openrisc/signal.c
> index cb74a9fe5e..9242d06002 100644
> --- a/linux-user/openrisc/signal.c
> +++ b/linux-user/openrisc/signal.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,18 @@
>  #include "signal-common.h"
>  #include "linux-user/trace.h"
>
> +/*
> + * Note that in linux/arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h,
> + * this is called user_regs_struct.  Given that this is what
> + * is used within struct sigcontext we need this definition.
> + * However, elfload.c wants this name.

Is this bit about elfload.c still relevant? (Presumably not as
it won't be able to see the definition now we've moved it.)

> + */
> +struct target_pt_regs {
> +    abi_ulong gpr[32];
> +    abi_ulong pc;
> +    abi_ulong sr;
> +};
> +
>  typedef struct target_sigcontext {
>      struct target_pt_regs regs;
>      abi_ulong oldmask;

Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to