On Fri, 8 Aug 2025 11:37:23 -0400
Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 10:55:25AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> > Please work with Lukas to figure out whether yank can be used here. I
> > think that's the correct approach. If the main loop is blocked, then
> > some out-of-band cancellation routine is needed. migrate_cancel() could
> > be it, but at the moment it's not. Yank is the second best thing.  
> 
> I agree.
> 
> migrate_cancel() should really be an OOB command..  It should be a superset
> of yank features, plus anything migration speficic besides yanking the
> channels, for example, when migration thread is blocked in PRE_SWITCHOVER.

Hmm, I think the migration code should handle this properly even if the
yank command is used. From the POV of migration, it sees that the
connection broke with connection reset. That is the same error as if the
other side crashes/is killed or a NAT/stateful firewall in between
reboots.

> 
> I'll add this into my todo; maybe I can do something with it this release.
> I'm happy if anyone would beat me to it.
> 
> > 
> > The need for a timeout is usually indicative of a design issue. In this
> > case, the choice of a coroutine for the incoming side is the obvious
> > one. Peter will tell you all about it! =)  
> 
> Nah. :)
> 

Attachment: pgpZObAYoYr0E.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to