On 8/30/25 01:31, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
@@ -624,8 +624,7 @@ static target_ulong h_confer(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
SpaprMachineState *spapr,
      }
cs->exception_index = EXCP_YIELD;
-    qatomic_set(&cs->exit_request, true);
-    cpu_loop_exit(cs);
+    cpu_exit(cs);
return H_SUCCESS;
  }

cpu_loop_exit does a longjmp; cpu_exit does not.

This may be a bug fix, but it's hard to tell.
If it is a bug fix, it should be separated.

I'm also having a hard time with e.g.

+++ b/system/cpu-timers.c
@@ -246,14 +246,14 @@ void qemu_timer_notify_cb(void *opaque, QEMUClockType 
type)
if (qemu_in_vcpu_thread()) {
         /*
-         * A CPU is currently running; kick it back out to the
+         * A CPU is currently running; kick it back out of the
          * tcg_cpu_exec() loop so it will recalculate its
          * icount deadline immediately.
          */
-        qemu_cpu_kick(current_cpu);
+        cpu_exit(current_cpu);

where the comment still says kick and we're replacing kick with exit.

I guess the root of this problem is that "kick" isn't a precise term, we ought to name it something else, and we should paint the bike shed green.


r~

Reply via email to